Professor, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
University of Chicago

Group Contact CV SnapShots
CMB Introduction '96   Intermediate '01   Polarization Intro '01   Cosmic Symphony '04   Polarization Primer '97   Review '02   Power Animations   Lensing   Power Prehistory   Legacy Material '96   PhD Thesis '95 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Cosmic Shear Clusters
Transfer Function WMAP Likelihood Reionization PPF for CAMB Halo Mass Conversion Cluster Abundance
Cosmology I [legacy 321] Cosmology II [321] Current Topics [282] Galaxies and Universe [242] Radiative Processes [305] Research Preparation [307] GR Perturbation Theory [408] CMB [448] Cosmic Acceleration [449]

Last Scattering

The main reason why polarization is so useful to the reconstruction process is that (cosmologically) it can only be generated by Thomson scattering. The polarization spectrum of the CMB is thus a direct snapshot of conditions on the last scattering surface. Contrast this with temperature fluctuations which can be generated by changes in the metric fluctuations between last scattering and the present, such as those created by gravitational potential evolution. This is the reason why the mere detection of large-angle anisotropies by COBE did not rule out wide classes of models such as cosmological defects. To use the temperature anisotropies for the reconstruction problem, one must isolate features in the spectrum which can be associated with last scattering, or more generally, the universe at a known redshift.

Furthermore, the polarization spectrum has potential advantages even for extracting information from features that are also present in the temperature spectrum, e.g. the acoustic peaks. The polarization spectrum is generated by local quadrupole anisotropies alone whereas the temperature spectrum has comparable contributions from the local monopole and dipole as well as possible contributions between last scattering and the present. This property enhances the prominence of features (see Fig. 14) as does the fact that the scalar polarization has a relatively sharp projection due to the geometry (see §3.2). Unfortunately, these considerations are mitigated by the fact that the polarization amplitude is so much weaker than the temperature. With present day detectors, one needs to measure it in broad tex2html_wrap_inline1272 -bands to increase the signal-to-noise (see Fig. 14 and Table 2).

  Fig. 14: Temperature, polarization, and temperature-polarization cross correlation predictions and sensitivity of MAP for a fiducial model with &Omega0=1, &Omegab=0.1, and h=0.5 cold dark matter model. The raw MAP satellite sensitivity (1&sigma errors on the recovered power spectrum binned in l is approximated by wT-1/2= 0.11μK for the temperature and wT -1/2= 0.15μK for the polarization and a FWHM beam of 0.25deg. Note that errors between spectra are correlated. While the reionized model (purple &tau=0.1) is impossible to distinguish from the fiducial model from temperature anisotropies alone, its effect on polarization is clearly visible at low l. Dashed lines for temperature-polarization correlation represent anticorrelation.

Animation: variations in the spectra as &tau is stepped from 0-1.

Next: Reionization