Professor, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
University of Chicago

Group Contact CV SnapShots
CMB Introduction '96   Intermediate '01   Polarization Intro '01   Cosmic Symphony '04   Polarization Primer '97   Review '02   Power Animations   Lensing   Power Prehistory   Legacy Material '96   PhD Thesis '95 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Cosmic Shear Clusters
Transfer Function WMAP Likelihood Reionization PPF for CAMB Halo Mass Conversion Cluster Abundance
Intro to Cosmology [243] Cosmology I [legacy 321] Cosmology II [321] Current Topics [282] Galaxies and Universe [242] Radiative Processes [305] Research Preparation [307] GR Perturbation Theory [408] CMB [448] Cosmic Acceleration [449]


Since polarization directly probes the last scattering epoch the first thing we learn is when that occurred, i.e. what fraction of photons last scattered at tex2html_wrap_inline1662 when the universe recombined, and what fraction rescattered when the intergalactic medium reionized at tex2html_wrap_inline1664 .

Since rescattering erases fluctuations below the horizon scale and regenerates them only weakly ([Efstathiou] 1988), we already know from the reported excess (over COBE) of sub-degree scale anisotropy that the optical depth during the reionized epoch was tex2html_wrap_inline1666 and hence


It is thus likely that our universe has the interesting property that both the recombination and reionization epoch are observable in the temperature and polarization spectrum.

Unfortunately for the temperature spectrum, at these low optical depths the main effect of reionization is an erasure of the primary anisotropies (from recombination) as tex2html_wrap_inline1672 . This occurs below the horizon at last scattering, since only on these scales has there been sufficient time to convert the originally isotropic temperature fluctuations into anisotropies. The uniform reduction of power at small scales has the same effect as a change in the overall normalization. For tex2html_wrap_inline1674 -20 the difference in the power spectrum is confined to large angles ( tex2html_wrap_inline1676 ). Here the observations are limited by ``cosmic variance'': the fact that we only have one sample of the sky and hence only tex2html_wrap_inline1678 samples of any given multipole. Cosmic variance is the dominant source of uncertainty on the low- tex2html_wrap_inline1272 temperature spectrum in Fig. 14.

The same is not true for the polarization. As we have seen the polarization spectrum is very sensitive to the epoch of last scattering. More specifically, the location of its peak depends on the horizon size at last scattering and its height depends on the duration of last scattering ([Efstathiou] 1988). This signature is not cosmic variance limited until quite late reionization, though the combination of low optical depth and partial polarization will make it difficult to measure in practice (see Fig. 14 and Table 2). Optical depths of a few percent are potentially observable from the MAP satellite ([Zaldarriaga et al.] 1997) and of order unity from the POLAR experiment ([Keating et al.] 1997).

On the other hand, these considerations imply that the interesting polarization signatures from recombination will not be completely obscured by reionization. We turn to these now.

Next: Scalars, Vectors, & Tensors